Understanding of the controvesy within the controversy of 9/11 Truth

9-11 Finding The Truth by Andrew Johnson

So, you want to know the truth about 9/11?

Maybe you have already uncovered certain truths about 9/11 that rocked your world view to its core?

I don't claim to have read all the available literature on 9/11. Several years ago, in 2004, I chanced upon a book by author Jim Marrs called "Inside Job: Unmasking the 9/11 Conspiracies". Having read and enjoyed his best-selling book "Rule by Secrecy: The Hidden History That Connects the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons, and the Great Pyramids" I knew I would enjoy reading his new book on 9/11 regardless of what truths it uncovered. "Did they just let it happen I wondered?" Then I read the book...

Years later I read, Professor David Ray Griffins book "The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé" which uncovered and exposed some very disturbing questions indeed. Professor Griffins book is a good primer to the issues which have been raised about 9/11 and showing that the official story of the event of that day cannot possibly be true.

Many people who have researched 9/11 reach a point where they believe they know what didn't happen on that day.

Some go further and claim they know what did happened on that day. They go from belief to disbelief then find comfort in a new belief - a new paradigm. So, can you only be lied to once? What if the peoples very reaction to the exposure of 9/11 truths is being "stage managed"?

This book goes headlong towards addressing that issue and naming names. The idea of "controlled opposition" is not new. Infiltration of organisations by intelligence agencies in the US and overseas is not only common but necessary in some cases. Has this happened to 9/11 Truth?

As a basic principle you can never really "know" what happened in event where you were not present without either i) taking a persons testimony as a matter of faith - or - ii) by the application of science and scientific principles. The word "science" comes from the latin scientia which means 'knowledge' or 'to know'. I do not choose blind faith. I choose knowledge through the science over faith every time.

Which brings us to this book: 9-11 Finding The Truth

This is a book collated from a series of lectures and articles written by researcher Andrew Johnson who has worked closely with Scholars for 9/11 Truth, Dr Judy Wood and inventor/researcher John Hutchinson. This is the first time this information has been published in chronological order. For me this has been pivitol in my understanding of the controvesy within the controversy of 9/11 Truth.

Could thermite really have disintergrated the World Trade Centre?
Why was the threat of Hurricane Erin on NYC on 9/11 not reported by the media?
What links Directed Energy research companies and Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) to 9/11?
What similarities to the Hutchinson Effect were observed on 9/11?
Why would a scientist with links to the US Department of Energy promote a theory about an "Active Thermitic Material" (thermite-like explosive) being used to destroy the two towers when no evidence of this has been found as ground zero?

If you want to know the truth you need to know the evidence...
As Johnson says... always check the evidence....

Review by Anthony Beckett

9-11 Finding the truth is available to buy at Amazon.com and Lulu.com.